Of course I miss typed the xeon. I meant to put it as a "v2" which has the previous architecture. Does the misspelling change your opinion on whether its worth it or not?Intel site says both are Haswell architecture parts. And differences are minimal. Not worth it for even 5 bucks, even less for 50.
We are talking about single digit or very low double digit performance increase without heavy use of AVX instructions on same clock speed. Since both have very similar clock speeds, performance difference is around that.Of course I miss typed the xeon. I meant to put it as a "v2" which has the previous architecture. Does the misspelling change your opinion on whether its worth it or not?
So can I generally assume processor clock speed determines performance difference?We are talking about single digit or very low double digit performance increase without heavy use of AVX instructions on same clock speed. Since both have very similar clock speeds, performance difference is around that.
For 50 bucks and assuming there is some work involved too, I don't think that's worth it. Better to invest on something else.
Combination of architecture and clock speed. Architecture in this case makes around 5-10% (depending on software) and clock speed difference is like 2-3% so basically you would have difficulty noticing difference between those.So can I generally assume processor clock speed determines performance difference?
And resolution/settings if you are talking games; the size of the gap between a 2008 i7 and a 2022 i7 narrows massively as you put more work on the GPU for example.So can I generally assume processor clock speed determines performance difference?